Yesterday I saw a Microsoft Kinect advert and knew i recognised that tune that was playing, seconds later I realise it’s post-punk Marxists Gang Of Four, little later still and I have the song - it’s “Natural’s not in it”
No need to rehash any selling out arguments - the most disappointing thing is that when you google “Gang of Four” and “Kinect” you find such a desert of outrage - pretty much no criticism, just forum posts asking what the song is, others claiming it’s the best thing about the Kinect. The only actual analysis from the point of view of selling out is from, slightly bizarrely, the blog of a self-professed Family Law Attorney & Certified Family Court Mediator. Selling out is now the norm, it no longer needs explaining, justifying, defending - it just is. Not-selling out is now the thing that needs explaining away - “what? you’re not taking the money? Are you insane?!”
It should also be considered that giving it to Microsoft to use is meant as some sort of subversive gesture, “haha, look at the idiots using our anti-consumerist tune to sell their product, do they not know what it’s about...” And yet it is a misplaced gesture, a gesture that Microsoft themselves presumably want to be associated with, adding a certain “kudos” to their brand among a certain type of person who the adverts could well be aimed at - emphasising the family fun to be had from the thing, appealing to a father say, a father who maybe grew up listening to Gang of Four and is now a family man and perhaps even Family Law Attorney...
If it had been “Return The Gift” it might have made more sense...
No need to rehash any selling out arguments - the most disappointing thing is that when you google “Gang of Four” and “Kinect” you find such a desert of outrage - pretty much no criticism, just forum posts asking what the song is, others claiming it’s the best thing about the Kinect. The only actual analysis from the point of view of selling out is from, slightly bizarrely, the blog of a self-professed Family Law Attorney & Certified Family Court Mediator. Selling out is now the norm, it no longer needs explaining, justifying, defending - it just is. Not-selling out is now the thing that needs explaining away - “what? you’re not taking the money? Are you insane?!”
It should also be considered that giving it to Microsoft to use is meant as some sort of subversive gesture, “haha, look at the idiots using our anti-consumerist tune to sell their product, do they not know what it’s about...” And yet it is a misplaced gesture, a gesture that Microsoft themselves presumably want to be associated with, adding a certain “kudos” to their brand among a certain type of person who the adverts could well be aimed at - emphasising the family fun to be had from the thing, appealing to a father say, a father who maybe grew up listening to Gang of Four and is now a family man and perhaps even Family Law Attorney...
If it had been “Return The Gift” it might have made more sense...